In the case of S.V. Narayanaswamy vs. Savithramma 2013R.F.A. No. 1163 of 2002 v R.F.A.No.1164 of Karnataka High Court, the complainant sought to prove the existence of an oral agreement on the sale of real estate, which was strongly alleged. With the complainant`s proof allowance, she did so by issuing cheques in several amounts for the entire estate consideration. In developing various pieces of evidence indicating the existence of a whole, the Tribunal confirmed the existence of the verbal agreement based on the examination of the evidence presented. All agreements are contracts if they are entered into by the free consent of the parties in accordance with the treaty, against legal consideration and with legitimate property, and are not expressly annulled heresafter. On the other hand, oral agreements are words, gestures, symbols by which one party transmits a promise or a series of promises to another, which becomes a valid oral agreement if accepted by the other party. They may be expressive or implicit. Valid oral agreements are legally applicable in court. It is not, however, of great probative value, because the agreement is obtained by the buer and by second-hand knowledge.
In the case of litigation or legal action, it is difficult for the court to determine the true nature of the facts and terms of the agreement without the bias being applied. An agreement must be supported by legal scrutiny on both sides. The “Privity of Contract” doctrine means that a contract is only a contract between the parties and that no third party can complain, i.e. a non-contractor cannot take legal action. Then there are the exceptions to the contract rule: 5. Factual error (section 20): “If both parties to an agreement have an error on an issue essential to the agreement, the agreement is null and fore. A party cannot be relieved because it has done a particular act in ignorance of the law. The error can be a bilateral error if both parties to an agreement are wrong. The error must be about an issue that is essential to the agreement. An oral agreement is as valid as a written agreement. The legality of an oral agreement cannot be questioned if it falls within the indecency of the requirements of paragraph 10 of the Indian Contract Act of 1872. A valid agreement must have the essence of a valid treaty, and that is it: treaty enforcement is a major problem in India, because the legal system can be slow and contested.
 India ranks 163rd out of 191 countries surveyed by the World Bank on the simple application of a treaty.  If the conclusion of a contract with pre-defined conditions is mandatory, that contract becomes a legal contract. If the contract contains certain contractual conditions prescribed by law, the current contract in this regard is imposed by law; Thermal Power Ltd. State of Madhya Pradesh, AIR 2000 SC 1005. A person who, because of his childhood, is not in a position to enter into a contract within the meaning of the law. The issue of cancelling or cancelling a contract presuppies the existence of a contract within the meaning of the law and cannot arise in the case of an infant; Mohoribi v. Dharmodas Ghose, (1903) 30 AI 114. 2. Unacceptable influence (section 16): “If a person able to control the will of another enters into a contract with him and the transaction appears at first sight or on the evidence to be unacceptable, the burden of proof is that that contract was not caused by an undue influence on the person in a position to control the will of the other.” A promise is essentially an offer or proposal made by one person or institution to another.