The comparison between the parties can be recorded in a restraining order requiring continued compliance by the parties. This is called an approval order. “A decree of approval is nothing more than a transaction that contains an injunction.” 3 Most civil proceedings are settled in court and most transactions are private agreements between the parties. As a general rule, the applicant will file an application to dismiss the case as soon as the transaction contract has been signed. The court then makes a decision to dismiss and the case is closed. However, if the defendant does not meet the terms of the transaction agreement, the applicant cannot reactivate the old remedy. This means filing a new action in court and going to the end of the line to deal with the case. Many of the early court proceedings involving an approval order set precedents for the role that judges would play in hearing, authorizing, interpreting and amending a transaction between two parties.    The role of the judge with respect to approval decrees between “rubber stamps” and the application of his own judgments to a proposed settlement.  In 1879, the Pacific Railroad of Missouri v.
Ketchum combined the role of the court in the approval decrees to simply support an agreement that the parties themselves have already entered into.   With respect to cartel and abuse of dominance orders, the first approval settlement used in the Sherman Antitrust Act Agreement Regulations was Swift -Co. v. United States.  With Swift and Co. v. United States, the Supreme Court held that an order of approval could only be amended or terminated if, over time, new developments produced a “serious injustice” in the manner in which the decision of the Order of Approval affects the parties to the appeal.   The Supreme Court has supported this limited flexibility of U.S.
approval orders outside the R.R. Ass terminal: “An order will not be extended by the implication or consideration that goes beyond the importance of its conditions if it is read in light of the issues and purposes for which the appeal was brought.”   Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 prohibits discrimination on the basis of race, sex, colour, religion or national origin.  Most remedial measures implemented under the Workplace Discrimination Act are in the form of approval decrees, in which employers may be required to award cash bonuses or introduce guidelines and programs to eliminate and prevent future discrimination.   These may be decrees requiring the creation of new recruitment and recruitment procedures to attract more candidates improving placement and promotion systems or providing training programs, focus on discrimination and diversity Under the Civil Rights Act of 1964 , the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) was established as the main body for monitoring and enforcing the remedies mentioned above in Title VII.  In a pioneering 1973 decision, the EEOC, the Ministry of Labour and AT-T compromised an approval decree that gradually eliminated discrimination in the recruitment, recruitment and employment of minorities and women.  This has set a precedent for other large U.S. private companies to avoid litigation and state oversight by creating executive orders in collaboration with Title VII.   Even if circumstances have changed significantly, a party cannot obey the decree.