Un Marrakesh Agreement

At the same event, UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres said “myths” surrounded the deal. Australia: The prime minister said the agreement could “undermine Australia`s border management laws and practices” and would not sign it. [38] Bulgaria: On 5 December, the government announced that it would not sign the agreement; its representatives would vote “abstention”. [50] Germany supported the agreement, but faced strong opposition. Alice Weidel, an MP from the far-right Alternative for Germany (AfD) party, said: “In fact, illegal immigration is legalised.” Reality Check looked at the details of the deal and why it encountered so much opposition. Dominican Republic: December 4 On December 12, 2018, the Dominican government set out its position on the Global Compact on Migration and decided that the Dominican state would not sign the agreement, as reported by the executive`s legal adviser, Flavio Darío Espinal, at a press conference. He also referred to the country`s participation in the Moroccan summit and announced that President Danilo Medina would not participate in the meeting. [27] The agreement stresses that all migrants have the right to universal human rights and aims to eliminate all forms of discrimination, including racism, xenophobia and intolerance against migrants and their families. How can a non-binding international agreement provoke a diplomatic crisis? Earlier this week, international heads of state and government met in Marrakesh, Morocco, to endorse the new Global Compact for Safe, Orderly and Regular Migration. In terms of minutes, this was the main UN conclave in 2018, after the regular opening of the General Assembly. But a lot of the messages were about who didn`t come. This global compact (known as mcmmy within the United Nations) has recently become one of the most controversial multilateral documents.

The United States, Australia, Israel and a number of European countries have distanced themselves in whole or in part from the deal, saying it envisages encouraging, not controlling, global flows. Criticism has increased in Europe as the date of signature of the agreement approaches. 2. The WTO shall organise negotiations between its Members on their multilateral trade relations on matters dealt with under the agreements set out in the Annexes to this Agreement. The WTO can also provide a forum for further negotiations among its members on their multilateral trade relations and a framework for the implementation of the results of these negotiations, as may be decided by the Ministerial Conference. Denmark: On November 27, Danish Prime Minister Lars Løkke Rasmussen said he supported the deal, but that his government would form a coalition of European countries to create an opt-out. [53] 5. There is a Council for Trade in Goods, a Council for Trade in Services and a Council on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (hereinafter referred to as the “TRIPS COUNCIL”) acting under the general direction of the General Council.

. . .